Search for: "Green v. Nail" Results 1 - 20 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2016, 8:05 pm by Jeff Gamso
 Sure, they marked their juror sheets with capital B's next to all the black jurors, then highlighted them in green. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 8:09 pm by Michael
Sink, check; Meek, check and bigtime (over weird and unsavory billionaire Jeff Greene); Gelber, check. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:08 am by Rebecca Green
For example, the Supreme Court held in Ray v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:25 pm
Lord Steyn had sat on the judging panel at the House of Lords in the case of Farley v Skinner [2001] – the main case I was about to use to support the first submission of my argument! [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 9:17 pm
  A search is conducted and two grams of a green leafy substance is found along with ledgers indicating sales. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 8:07 am by John Timmer
The rules came in response to a Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:25 am by Andrew Frisch
We note further that, like FLSA liquidated damages, prejudgment interest also is meant “‘to compensate the wronged party for being deprived of the monetary value of his loss from the time of the loss to the payment of the judgment.'” Greene v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:25 am by Andrew Frisch
We note further that, like FLSA liquidated damages, prejudgment interest also is meant “‘to compensate the wronged party for being deprived of the monetary value of his loss from the time of the loss to the payment of the judgment.'” Greene v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 12:22 am
As to the combination between colour and shapes, the Court mentioned another similar case decided by the EU General Court with reference to the green square illustrated on the right (decision in Case T‑282/09, Fédération internationale des logis v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:35 am by Bona Law PC
The next day at school, a final tiebreaker vote would come down to Mikey v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 11:00 pm by Sam Murrant
In the courts Reilly & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Rev 1) [2012] EWHC 2292 (Admin) High Court rejects challenge to Government’s compulsory work experience scheme on human rights and legality grounds. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by Kelly
Hmmmmm …  (IAM) USPTO petitions (Patently-O) A first look at USPTO petitions data (Patently-O) Peer to Patent starts with 11 new applications (Article One Partners) (IP Spotlight) The grass gets greener: USPTO to extend and expand Green Patent Fast Track Program (Green Patent Blog) ‘Thankfully the Patent Office and the Courts have chosen to largely ignore the Supreme Court test’ – KSR v. [read post]